« Home | Heavy contamination found in New Orleans, includin... » | Experts Cite New Orleans Disaster Health Risks » | New Orleans Workers Sick, Groups Protest » | Another critique of the LSU Study » | LSU Conflict of Interest on Testing? » | Scientist Warns Legislature: DO NOT Return to New ... » | Another Must Read from Michelle Chen » | How to Handle Asbestos and Other Hazmats (In one w... » | New Orleans Lessons - Could it happen to you? » | Nagin Campaigns to Rush People Back »

Friday, November 04, 2005


The Los Angeles Times reports today that “Katrina Cough” has started to affect those who have returned to the City. Residents who have been exposed to toxic muck, that has turned into toxic dust, have started to complain of “sinus headaches, congestion, runny noses and sore throats,” which one doctor describes as “very prevalent” among returnees.

Yet, the EPA continues to maintain that the air is safe in New Orleans, telling the City Council that the air is no different than before Katrina. Additionally, in the LA Times story, government health agencies say there is no real longterm problem. This is, they say, simply an allergic reaction.

Where have I heard this before?

In New York, post 9/11, the EPA and other government agencies did everything within their power to downplay any health risks to those exposed to World Trade Center dust, basically calling anyone who tried to warn the public alarmist.

The comparisons are eerie. Just look at these quotes from today’s LA Times story compared to New York, post 9/11.

LA TIMES, TODAY: “Numerous factors have contributed to the public's confusion…. For example, despite the mold warnings, the government has issued repeated public assurances that the air quality in areas affected by Katrina is safe. But tests of air quality have been aimed almost entirely at toxins, such as benzene, in areas where the storm caused oil spills. There has been very little testing, officials said, of "biologicals" — namely, the airborne mold that appears to be causing much of the problem.Most state and federal officials believe there is no need for additional testing because the contamination is confined largely to houses that were flooded during the storm."It is an indoor environmental problem, primarily," said Dr. Stephen Redd, chief of the air pollution and respiratory health branch at the National Center for Environmental Health, an arm of the federal Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.”

WASHINGTON POST, JANUARY 8, 2002: “The EPA, which has conducted thousands of tests of Lower Manhattan's air since Sept. 11, has repeatedly assured residents that the air is safe to breathe. Doctors note that some symptoms could be caused or enhanced by stress -- and many will undoubtedly dissipate as the last smoldering fires go out and the air grows clearer….
Alerted to concerns about Tabb's building, he said, the project hired an independent industrial hygienist to conduct tests of surfaces there on Dec. 3, using methods published by the American Society for Testing and Materials. The tests found the presence of settled asbestos dust 555 times above the suggested acceptable level.

Asked about those results, spokesman Geoff Ryan of the city's Department of Environmental Protection said the department does not recognize this type of test, and that its own tests at the building, done on Dec. 12, had come back negative.”

LA TIMES, TODAY: “Among healthy people, the condition is not considered serious and can generally be treated with antihistamines, nasal sprays or, in the case of bacterial infections, antibiotics.”

FOX NEWS, JANUARY 11 2002: “The Uniformed Firefighters Association estimates that about one-third of its 9,000 members suffer from "World Trade Center cough." One must wonder, though, how many of these men are simply suffering from the flu-related symptoms — it is flu season after all.

What's going on with the Tabbs and others, if not World Trade Center Syndrome? My bet is a combination of anxiety salted with hypochondria. Stress is a well-known asthma and headache trigger.”

Many reporters trusted government spin, both from Federal and City agencies. After all, these were government agencies charged with doing everything they could to protect the public health. Why in the hell would they want to downplay health risks, and endanger the public health?!

Why would the Pentagon, which is supposed to help provide for Troops and protect them continue to refuse to acknowledge things are screwed up in Iraq and our Troops need help?

In their quest to be “fair and balanced,” the press overcompensates, unfortunately. Whether it is Iraq or Gulf War Syndrome or World Trade Center cough or Katrina Cough, the media so tries to not be alarmist that it ends up being apologist. In the end, that keeps pressure off the decision makers and things don’t get done right until it is too late.

So what happened to those who had World Trade Center cough? Well, read this story from yesterday, which reads, in part:

“The latest follow-up report on lung function in New York City firefighters shows that firefighters who served in rescue efforts in the World Trade Center collapse are showing "accelerated pulmonary function decline”…."

Yes, that’s right. That cough that was just stress, or allergies and was supposed to be short-term has resulted in pulmonary decline that is 12 times higher than the normal aging process.

If Mayor Nagin doesn’t act like a leader and take charge, and if the EPA doesn’t stop sending it’s downplayed messages, they will have blood on their hands.

E-mail this post

Remember me (?)

All personal information that you provide here will be governed by the Privacy Policy of Blogger.com. More...

If it is not dangerous to breath in mold and other toxin producing substances that are currently floating in the New Orleans air, then why was there a $22.6 Million dollar settlement last week in LA for mold exposure?

Associated Press
Fri, Nov. 04, 2005

SoCal family wins record $22.6 million toxic mold settlement

LOS ANGELES - A family won a record $22.6 million settlement in a case in which they alleged that toxic mold in their home caused brain damage in their infant son.

"$22.6 million, certainly in a single-family home (case), would be the largest in the country," said Raymond P. Boucher, president of the Consumer Attorneys Association of Los Angeles.

The highest portion - $13 million - was paid by the Crenshaw Lumber Co. Inc. of Gardena, which was one of 17 defendants. The plaintiffs alleged that the company improperly stored framing studs, allowing mold to grow which then contaminated the home that was being built in Manhattan Beach.

Crenshaw Lumber settled on Oct. 19, the day after a Los Angeles Superior Court judge barred the wood supplier from using 10 of its 17 experts, including a toxicologist and microbiologist, said attorney Brian D. Witzer, who represented the Gorman family, who were the plaintiffs in the case.

Neither Crenshaw nor any of the other defendants admitted liability.

"We wish to emphasize that had the judge not excluded important expert witnesses from testifying ... we believe that the jury would have completely vindicated the company," Crenshaw said in a statement.

Barring the experts would have proved fatal to the defense, said Costa Mesa attorney Thomas S. Salinger, co-chair of Rutan & Tucker's construction law practice group.

"It's tantamount to not having a jury hear both sides of the story," he said.

The case is unusual not just for the settlement amount but also because contractors, not suppliers, are generally held responsible for construction defects, Salinger said.

Experts predicted the settlement will lead to more such cases.

The Gormans' son, Kellen, was born three months after they moved into their custom-built home in September 1999. They lived there for about two years.

Kellen, now 5, functions as a 1 1/2-year-old and needs 24-hour care, Witzer said. He blamed the boy's developmental problems on mold.

But Los Angeles attorney James D. Fraser, who defended a sheet metal company in the suit, said Kellen's doctors concluded he suffered from autism - a condition for which there is no known cause.


Information from: Daily Journal










Hello, very nice site! Please also visit my homepages:

Add a comment


Powered by FeedBlitz

About Us

  • We are the New Orleans Environmental Blog Team
  • We are a group of former Congressional staff, Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) staff, and environmental group staff tracking and analyzing the news, in real time, from New Orleans from an environmental health perspective.

  • Our profile
Powered for Blogger
by Blogger Templates

Powered by Blogger